Physical contact is not a required element of such relationships. A Covered Relationship may exist on the basis of a single interaction. The University of Michigan strives to create and maintain a community that enables each person to reach their full potential. To do so requires an environment of trust, openness, civility, and respect. The teacher-student relationship lies at the foundation of the educational process. As a matter of sound judgment and professional ethics, faculty members have a responsibility to avoid any apparent or actual conflict between their professional responsibilities and personal relationships with students. Faculty have a collective responsibility to the student experience as members and representatives of the University community, and with each class of incoming students who are bound together in space and time. The faculty at the University fulfill their essential role with students in learning, research, and service environments, and do so with a commitment to honoring the highest professional and ethical standards. An overarching goal for the context of the faculty-student relationship is to create a professional, productive, and equitable environment for independent learning and academic growth. Student well-being and the pursuit of academic excellence are central to any faculty-student relationship.
College and University Blog
This policy also applies to any individual under contract or on assignment at the university. This policy does not apply to student employees. Nothing in this policy replaces university policies on prohibited discrimination, harassment, and retaliation. Nor does it replace other university policies that may be related to conduct or relationships covered by this policy.
Universities Grapple with Student-Faculty Relationships to better protect them, typically with a campus-wide ban on staff dating undergrads. Announcing the policy after it was approved by a faculty vote on April 1, Dean of.
Policy no. Case Western Reserve University is a community that values an environment of inclusion, trust, and respect as beneficial for the working and learning environment of all its constituents. Romantic or sexual relationships may occur in a University environment given the numbers of people on a University campus. All relationships must be consensual; but, even though the relationship is consensual, it can raise serious concerns about the validity of the consent, conflicts of interest, and preferential treatment.
There are certain circumstances when romantic or sexual relationships are expressly prohibited, unless managed as described below:. Such relationships also may have the potential to result in claims of sexual harassment. Such management plan may include, for example, changing the supervisor, having a different faculty member evaluate academic or job-related work, or having the student change courses and may require cessation of either the personal or supervisory professional relationship.
Allegations, reports, or other information relating to unreported romantic or sexual relationships where one party has evaluative or supervisory responsibilities over the other party will be investigated. Potential noncompliance with the policy will be reported by the above-listed supervisors, department chairs, deans, or other responsible persons to Human Resources and investigated by the appropriate offices listed above. Persons in violation of this policy shall be subject to sanctions ranging from verbal warnings to termination, as provided by applicable University policies.
The University reserves the right to discipline members of the University community who make false allegations of unreported consensual relationships. Faculty, staff, and students may not use in a sexual harassment proceeding a defense based upon consent when the facts establish that a faculty-student, staff-student, senior faculty-junior faculty, or supervisor-employee power differential existed within the relationship.
Go to case.
1.7.2 Consensual Sexual or Romantic Relationships In the Workplace and Educational Setting
The following examples are provided for illustrative purposes only. This is not intended to be an exhaustive list of situations in which this policy applies. These examples illustrate the application of this policy, which as stated in II The University of Iowa Search. Operations Manual.
The purpose of this policy is to ensure that the correct procedure is followed so that members of staff are not open to young people (for example teachers, student mentors, academic staff etc.) to have a Next review date: February
This policy highlights the risks in sexual or romantic relationships in the Stanford workplace or academic setting between individuals in inherently unequal positions; prohibits certain relationships between teachers and students; and requires recusal from supervision and evaluation and notification in other relationships. Applies to all students, faculty, staff, and others who participate in Stanford programs and activities.
There are special risks in any sexual or romantic relationship between individuals in inherently unequal positions, and parties in such a relationship assume those risks. In the university context, such positions include but are not limited to teacher and student, supervisor and employee, senior faculty and junior faculty, mentor and trainee, adviser and advisee, teaching assistant and student, principal investigator and postdoctoral scholar or research assistant, coach and athlete, attending physician and resident or fellow, and individuals who supervise the day-to-day student living environment and their students.
Because of the potential for conflict of interest, exploitation, favoritism, and bias, such relationships may undermine the real or perceived integrity of the supervision and evaluation provided. Further, these relationships are often less consensual than the individual whose position confers power or authority believes. In addition, circumstances may change, and conduct that was previously welcome may become unwelcome. Even when both parties have consented at the outset to a sexual or romantic involvement, this past consent does not remove grounds for a charge based upon subsequent unwelcome conduct.
Such relationships may also have unintended, adverse effects on the climate of an academic program or work unit, thereby impairing the learning or working environment for others — both during such a relationship and after any break-up. Relationships in which one party is in a position to evaluate the work or influence the career of the other may provide grounds for complaint by third parties when that relationship gives undue access or advantage, restricts opportunities, or simply creates a perception of these problems.
Additionally, even when a relationship ends, there may be bias even if unintentional for or against the former partner, or there could be an ongoing impression of such bias; in other words, the effects of a romantic or sexual relationship can extend beyond the relationship itself. For all of these reasons, sexual or romantic relationships–whether regarded as consensual or otherwise–between individuals in inherently unequal positions should in general be avoided and in many circumstances are strictly prohibited by this policy.
Steve Hunt was emotionally wrecked. Steve acted mortified, at first refusing to admit his son was right. He had feelings for a student.
To accomplish the University’s goals, relationships between students, faculty of this policy, are currently involved in an amorous, dating or sexual relationship.
This policy covers all UW System employees, students, and affiliated individuals. The purpose of this policy is to ensure that the employment and academic environment is free from real or perceived conflicts of interest when UW employees, students, and affiliated individuals, in positions of unequal power, are involved in consensual romantic or sexual relationships. Even where negative consequences to the participants do not result, such relationships create an environment charged with potential or perceived conflicts of interest and possible use of academic or supervisory leverage to maintain or promote the relationship.
Romantic or sexual relationships that the parties may view as consensual may still raise questions of favoritism, as well as of an exploitative abuse of trust and power. The following two types of consensual relationships are addressed in this policy: 1 employee with a student; and 2 employee with another employee. It is a violation of this policy for an instructor to commence a consensual relationship with a student currently under their instruction, and may result in disciplinary action against that employee.
If an instructor or other employee fails to meet the requirements for disclosing the relationship with a student or another employee, or fails to cooperate in the actions described above, such a failure constitutes a violation of this policy and may result in disciplinary action taken against that employee. To report potential violations of this policy, individuals should contact either the Director of Human Resources or the Title IX Coordinator.
Retaliation against persons who report concerns about potential violations of this policy is prohibited. Each UW institution shall publish this policy in a location accessible to faculty, staff, students, and the public.
Former Student, Fair Game?
Institutions tend to either ban student-faculty dating altogether or where a supervisory relationship exists. The ages of the couple — her, 25; him, 71 — are unusually far apart. Princeton, like a growing number of institutions, has banned all student-faculty relationships, including for graduate students. Platt has said that she waited until two years after her graduation to ask Mitchell out. Mitchell, who is currently on preplanned leave, is just one of a number of professors to engage in or attempt to initiate a relationship with a former student or students.
The Policy also states that faculty or staff employees may not supervise or evaluate students to whom they are related by blood, law, or marriage. Because the.
To address situations in which two persons have an apparently voluntary romantic or sexual relationship, but where a power differential exists because of their roles within the university, e. The University of Kansas has a tradition of commitment to providing an academic community environment that, without discrimination, fosters intellectual, professional and personal growth. Central to the preservation of this environment is the trust that should characterize all interactions among those working toward the common goal of the institution, namely, our students, faculty, unclassified staff, and university support staff.
This trust is put at risk when members of the University community engage in consenting romantic or sexual relationships that involve persons of unequal power, for example, administrator and faculty, faculty and student, supervisor and employee. Because the University of Kansas strongly disapproves of consenting relationships where a professional power differential exists, this policy statement is being promulgated.
These principles also apply to administrators and supervisors in their relationships with students, faculty, unclassified staff, and university support staff. Those who choose to ignore these standards will stand responsible for their actions and risk the loss of support of the University community. If an employee’s supervisor attempts to initiate a personal relationship, the employee may feel that the employee’s options are similarly limited. As a result, the degree of informed consent that exists within such a relationship is difficult to establish.
Should a charge of sexual harassment follow, a claim of mutual consent may be difficult to sustain.
Management of Personal Conflicts of Interest for the University of Arizona
The purpose of this policy is to set forth expectations for University community members regarding amorous or sexual relationships and to ensure that such relationships do not result in actual or perceived impropriety. The University of North Florida is committed to providing and maintaining a working and learning environment that is fulfilling and equitable for all members of the University community including students, faculty and staff. Implicit in the University’s commitment is that all community members conduct themselves in an ethical manner in their interactions and relationships with each other.
To accomplish the University’s goals, relationships between students, faculty and staff must be based on integrity, respect and trust.
This policy has been superseded by the Romantic and Sexual Relationships Between Faculty/Staff and Undergraduate Students policy. Please visit.
UPPS No. It is the policy of Texas State University that employees with direct teaching, supervisory, advisory, or evaluative responsibility over other employees, students, or student employees recognize and respect the ethical and professional boundaries that must exist in such situations. While relationships between consenting adults are a personal matter, they can create potential conflicts in the workplace and in the educational setting.
Such relationships also have the potential for exploitation of an employee, student, or student employee and can possibly create professional or academic disadvantages for third parties. Consensual relationships between employees in positions of authority with their subordinates, including their students, are prohibited unless the person in the position of authority discloses the relationship immediately or as soon as possible.
The subordinate person is also encouraged to disclose the relationship; however, disclosure by the subordinate person does not relieve the employee in the position of authority of the duty to report immediately. The person in the position of authority in these consensual relationships should make the report to his or her immediate supervisor and cooperate in making alternative arrangements.
These arrangements may include the reassignment of either party or other actions to change any conflict of interest or appearance of impropriety created because of duties associated with teaching, supervising, advising, evaluating, and grading.